• Sections

  • Why were there like, 300 workshops at General Assembly? Seriously - why? There were only 6000 UUs there - a large number of UUs, to be sure, but 300 workshops seems ridonkulous. This doesn’t even include the multitude of private receptions, organizational meetings and daily “check-ins” among various committees.

    The amount of energy that goes into planning for GA programming is HUGE and taps the resources of organizations and individuals. So why is there so much of it? Has it always been like this? Does it need to be like this? Does the need for plenary have something to do with it?

    Once again, I’ll look at the Islamic Society of North America conference for comparison. They have about 30,000 attendees - and about half the programming of General Assembly. Granted, it is a shorter convention by two days, but at five times the number of attendees … it is not even close to approaching the low workshop to attendee ratio of GA.

    Also, the fact that Muslims pray five times a day means there are some built in breaks -two 2-hour blocks of zero-programming at lunch time and in the evening. Doesn’t that sound so … humane?

    But really, it’s not the hurrying from one thing to another that bothers me (one can always choose to not attend back to back to back events); it’s the fact that a single organization might be coordinating half a dozen events, which means that they’re expending a lot of resources and staff (or volunteer) time to something that will happen … once. Can’t we cure ourselves of AAS - Academy Awards Syndrome? Plus, if we didn’t have so many friggin workshops, maybe GA could be held over a long weekend, instead of over five days, thereby making it more affordable for all.

    I’m sure this conversation has taken place many times before. What don’t I know? Can someone explain to me what the thought process is behind this?

    Popularity: 7% [?]

    Not-so-fast forward to Atlanta, Georgia, where I’ve come to participate in the 1st United States Social Forum (USSF). General Assembly flew by after Day 2, and I didn’t find myself with enough alone time to write entries I’d consider post-worthy. But what a shame … there were several experiences I really wanted to share with you all, but I’m a very, very slow writer.

    I do want to make note of a few highlights, however:

    And that is that - my GA experience wrapped up in a nutshell. There’s plenty more - especially related to personal interactions with folk, but there just isn’t time right now.

    Popularity: 16% [?]

    This is pretty fun. There are a lot of people here, so the interest must be high. I suspect that in 3 to 6 months there will be a big increase in the number of blogs run by UU churches and organizations. As I said in my first day GA review, for DRUUMM it’s been a real boon. Also, I think I’m the only brown person here. The few people of color I’ve spoken to about blogging have expressed a total lack of interest because they are already swamped. But I’m not alone - you can find other blogs of by UUs of color in the sidebar of the DRUUMM.org website.

    Popularity: 9% [?]

    I discovered this from Liberal Faith Development’s site*! My blog is rated “G” - even though I used the word “pooped” (once).

    What's My Blog Rated? From Mingle2 - Online Dating

    Mingle2 - Online Dating

    *I can’t attach a link because of where I’m blogging from right now - technical difficulties. The link is: http://liberalfaith.blogspot.com/2007/06/my-blog-is-rated-r.html

    Popularity: 29% [?]

    Attended this last night. Chris Walton (Philocrites), and Deb Weiner, Dir. of Electronic Communications for the UUA organized it. It felt very different from last year, and I felt the absence of a lot of bloggers I read. No ArbitraryMarks, Peacebang, Rev Sean, A People so Bold!, Elizabeth, or Radical Hapa. It also felt strange that Shawn Anthony wasn’t there because I so enjoyed meeting him last year, and boy - did that remind me of how much can change in one year!

    Dan Harper (Yet Another UU) is a real trip! He is so funny, and straightforward. Chance (Making Chutney) looks surprisingly sweet and innocent - but that could just be the fact that he has the longest eyelashes ever! (So. Not. Fair.)  ChaliceChick was there again with Linguist Friend; I’d met them both last year.  Rev Christine Robinson of iMinister seems serious and looks just like her photo, while Rev Fred Wooden looked like he was ready to dance in his soft, black shoes (it works for him). And Miss Kitty was there, too! Other folks were there, but because I missed half of introductions, I didn’t catch their names.

    I was running on empty by the end of the meeting, so I didn’t even talk to anyone much except Michael (my ride) about the Belief-O-Matic quiz (which introduced me to UUism when I scored 100% on it - it labeled him 100% secular humanist), and Chris. I was feeling a little too pooped to start up a genuine conversation with folks, but I hope to see everyone again at the Bloggers’ Dinner.

    One thing I didn’t talk about during the reception was how much easier managing the website for DRUUMM is using the blog format. I used to dread going into the files and creating new content, but now I actually look forward to it. When you’re talking about a small, volunteer-run organization looking to communicate with its constituents and the wider world for little to zero money, a blog format has got to be the way to go. I still need to add more content (such as by-laws and documents) to the DRUUMM website (druumm.org), but I’ll soon be able to hand the reigns (and passwords) over to the next DRUUMM Communications Coordinator. Also, traffic is good - in two weeks, it’s had nearly 1000 hits.

    At the reception, Deb mentioned to me that she read my blog and really enjoyed it, and earlier in the evening, Barbara Preuninger approached me and told me the same thing. These are two very pleasant and friendly women, and yet I felt so overwhelmed. Apart from “thank you” I couldn’t think of what to say!  It feels good to know that a person is listening and that your words mean something to someone, but how does one respond? Once every few months I’ll get a direct email from a reader and it’s the same dilemma. I don’t feel that having a blog is me doing something, nor do I view my posts in the same way I would a paper or article (which I do know how to receive feedback on).  I mean, what does it mean when someone likes reading your blog? It doesn’t mean they necessarily agree with you (esp. since controversial blogs seem to be among the most popular). I’m having a hard time wrapping my mind around that one.

    Popularity: 11% [?]

    ← Previous PageNext Page →

    Close
    E-mail It
    visitors since June 16, 2007